Game characters were better in the '90s

by Leigh Harris Featured 10 Comments 31 Votes 3459 Views 24/01/2013 Back to Articles

Back in the '90s, I played a heap of games which were incredibly immersive. I was sucked right in, and genuinely felt for the characters on screen.

Perhaps it’s because I was young, or perhaps it was due to the rose-tinted glasses I now undoubtedly wear, but I just felt like I cared much more about those characters than the ones of today.

I feel like the reason for this can best be articulated in the same way one can understand the difference between characters in books and characters in movies.

One thing many '90s games had in common was a lack of proper voice acting. In its stead was text, and lots of it.

This allowed for several things:

  • A relationship with a narrator
  • A relationship with your character’s thoughts
  • Voices and acting were as good as you could imagine them in your head

The silent protagonist was largely a technological device. The protagonist was essentially you, a disembodied, soulless being into which you could pour yourself.

There was no horrifically poor voice acting to make you wince and distance you from the character – you were your own being reacting as yourself.

As technology allowed, 3D games moved to third person predominantly. While some modern games like Metro still use pure first person, a relationship with a character as an extrinsic entity held and holds much more appeal for game designers and storytellers who revel in the ability to create characters and have people fall in love with them.

A first-person shooter developer in the '90s had no such ability.

With great technology, however, comes great responsibility.

The initial leaps into 3D with voice acting were paltry attempts, and more often than not they made us wince. Think of the opening of ‘Sin’, with those ridiculous lines being the game’s opening. Compare it to ‘Unreal’, which came out only a short while earlier, and the sense of real danger was palpable. You’d explore a vast and empty world and never say a word, reading the diary entries of fallen soldiers and devastated natives, picturing the events entirely in your imagination and coming up with a very dark image indeed.

The moral of the story is this: that in game design, more is not necessarily better.

In a sense, the world’s emptiness was itself due to technological limitations. They simply couldn’t fit too many enemies on screen at once with PCs being as ineffectual as they were. The end result, however, was that they had to ramp up the difficulty of the enemies to compensate, so encountering one was truly terrifying. A one-on-one battle was enough to kill you at any point.

The old saying that constraints breed creativity holds very true in gaming.

When adventure game designers in the Sierra days had to convey that something was happening with barely an ability to animate, they wrote a message telling you what was going on.

Left to your own devices, you’d be able to bring yourself to an eerie chill in titles with characters made of pixels which could be counted on two hands.

The moral of the story is this: that in game design, more is not necessarily better.

At the moment there are very few developers that know how to appreciate silence, empty space and the lingering camera. All too often a score removes tension just by being there (in games the score usually indicates when action is about to happen, and can ruin the mood by comforting the player in knowing there aren’t any enemies around).

We’ve been proving to ourselves for such a long time that our medium can be as cinematic as cinema, but we’ve also been overcompensating, trying to make everything bombastic and larger than life and failing to appreciate the art of moderation.

If FTL can convince me to care about a few blobs of pixels on a screen even today, so can anyone else.

So again, the burden of responsibility for employing voice acting, 3D graphics, scores and other peripheral cinematic devices lies not in using them as frequently as you can, but in knowing what effect each will have on a game’s tone and use them sparingly and accordingly.

By Leigh Harris

Link to us
Vote for this article Log in with Facebook

Game characters were better in the '90s Comments

Leave a comment Log in with Facebook
I used to only play racing, fighting and shooting games. The first real game that got me hooked on big epics was Ocarina of Time. A lot of text but I loved every second. I actually cared about the character and his friends, and his mission.
It's still one of my all time favourites.
I think the title should be fixed to this:

Games were better in the '90s

I dunno, GLaDOS is probably my favourite character ever.
Everything was better in the 90's.

Matthew said: I think the title should be fixed to this:
Games were better in the '90s

Gah! I hate this view because there are good and bad characters from every decade! Sure, AAA titles probably don't seem to be too great but if you peel back that commercial crap and take a look at some lesser known titles, you can find amazing characters. Also, I agree. GLADOS is an incredible character.

Matthew said: I think the title should be fixed to this:
Games were better in the '90s

Games were better when I was a kid.

Sandallman said:

Matthew said: I think the title should be fixed to this:
Games were better in the '90s

Games were better when I was a kid.

I think this is very true as well.

As we grow our imaginations seem to fade out and what was once a wonderful fantasy world in our minds seems to die.

I remember playing Sonic as an eight year old and wondering what he did once he collected all the rings. Did he go home and have dinner, would he hang out and be friendly with all the foes in the game when no one else was watching. I would wonder where he would show up next? In space, underwater, behind the controls of a plane...

Those are the things that made gaming special for me. I remember playing Golden Axe and wondering if they all had castles of their own that they went back to and if they had their own dragons for flying around and racing...

I guess as we grow up we lose that wonderment and excitement- the mystery dies and we just start playing as grown ups.
Both FF7 and Ocarina of Time forged an emotional bond with me that no other game has managed to do; Skyrim is coming close, though.

Post a comment

Leave a comment Log in with Facebook

Recently Read

Featured PS3 Content

Most Anticipated May Game

Most Anticipated May Game

30/04/2015 Polls 6 13
Lost Dimension coming to Australia for PS3, Vita

Lost Dimension coming to Australia for PS3, Vita

Gryllis 19 hours News 0 4
Friendly Fire Show 97: No Subtitle

Friendly Fire Show 97: No Subtitle

Podcast 23 hours Articles 0 2
Rockstar is trying to stop BBC

Rockstar is trying to stop BBC's GTA drama being released

Gryllis 3 days News 0 3
Life is Strange Episode 3 - Chaos Theory review
Jayden27 3 days Reviews 1 5
Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain rated R18+
Gryllis 4 days News 2 10
5 Games to play next if you love The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

5 Games to play next if you love The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

Tyrus 4 days Articles 6 9

Community Content

Wii U - 2, MMGN - 0

Wii U - 2, MMGN - 0

01/05/2015 Blog 14 1