AFL Talk 11 - locked

winga26 said: Swans vs GWS has been a shocking bore hopefully something happens in the second half, this is as bad as our first meeting with them.

kangle4 said: Decent from the Swans in the end.

Ben said: First game of footy in 3 weeks is Port vs Geelong with all the semi-decent players out.
Fun afternoon ahead

Gaminggirl said: Just got home from the game what a match, Well done by the Crows to get up and win. Umpiring was shocking 21 - 11 Richmond way they have no idea of the game.
Walker wont even get sited they paid holding the ball and he didnt get injured so the way it has gone this year no injury no suspension and he landed on his shoulder not his head.
Go Crows.

Gaminggirl said: Yes it does matter there is no law that says you cant lift someone.
That he was not hurt and did not land on his head but his shoulder and the way the panel has gone this year. He will not get done.

kangle4 said: Port already getting a bad run with the umpires at Geelong.

-PAYZEE- said: ...nice goin Crows!!! ...

kangle4 said: Sam Gibson 90 SC, 110 DT

winga26 said: Swans vs GWS has been a shocking bore hopefully something happens in the second half, this is as bad as our first meeting with them.

Dusty Lids said:
ffs who said walker won' get in trouble? that was one of the worst sling tackle/dumping i have ever seen. lonergan got 1 week for much smaller then that. Worse then trengroves. If he doesn't get at least 3 weeks the afl has lost the plot. Yes morris didn't get hurt but it was far more dangerous then anything i have seen this year and really stupid by walker.

Gaminggirl said: Yes it wasnt the best tackle. But you dont get done for maybe this maybe that.
1) He wasnt injured.
2) Never hit his head
3) You dont get done for he could of got injured or he could of done that other wise we will start getting reports every week.

Pilkingbod said:

Gaminggirl said: Yes it wasnt the best tackle. But you dont get done for maybe this maybe that.
1) He wasnt injured.
2) Never hit his head
3) You dont get done for he could of got injured or he could of done that other wise we will start getting reports every week.

1) He could have been injured.
2) He could have hit his head.
3) You should get done for potentially injuring another player.
It's still a crime to intend to murder someone, even if you didn't. Why is this any different?

gammaray13 said:
Cos it's a game of football twit